Almost a decade ago, suburbs like Baldivis were held up as proof that Australia’s rooftop solar experiment was working. In 2017, ARENA identified Baldivis as one of the country’s most renewable suburbs, with solar panels installed on a majority of homes. High uptake, strong sunshine, falling power bills. On paper, it looked like the future was arriving early.
Fast forward to 2025, and that same success tells a more complicated story. In solar-dense commuter suburbs across Western Australia (WA), rooftop systems now generate far more electricity than the local grid can comfortably absorb during the middle of the day. Houses sit empty while panels continue to produce, exports surge, and network operators are forced to manage voltage, congestion, and stability at a street-by-street level. What once looked like an unqualified win has become a stress test for infrastructure that was never designed for this kind of energy flow.
This is the uncomfortable reality of the country’s energy transition: solar abundance does not automatically equal grid resilience. In fact, being in the wrong place at the wrong time can create constraints rather than relief. Falling feed-in tariffs (FiTs), tighter export limits, and growing interest in community batteries are not random policy shifts but responses to a system that has moved faster than its foundations.
How early success exposed a local grid problem
When ARENA highlighted Baldivis in 2017, it was doing so to showcase how fast rooftop solar had been adopted in outer-metro Australia. The suburb ticked every box policy makers liked to see: new housing stock, high owner-occupancy, plenty of roof space, and strong solar resources. What wasn’t yet obvious was that this level of uptake would collide with the limits of local electricity networks long before it challenged the national grid.
Australia’s distribution networks were built for a very different energy system. Power was designed to flow one way, from large generators through substations and down into homes. Transformers, feeders, and voltage regulators were sized around predictable evening demand, not thousands of small generators exporting simultaneously in the middle of the day. When a suburb reaches very high solar penetration, those assumptions break down at the street level.
The result is not a clean energy shortage, but a surplus in the wrong place at the wrong time. Hundreds of systems exporting together can push local voltages outside acceptable ranges, overload equipment that was never designed for reverse flows, and force network operators to intervene. This is why export limits, dynamic curtailment, and tighter connection rules tend to appear first in solar-heavy suburbs, even when the broader grid still relies heavily on fossil generation.
What Baldivis demonstrates is that the energy transition doesn’t stall because Australia runs out of sunshine. It slows when local infrastructure reaches its physical limits. Suburbs that embraced rooftop solar early are simply the first to reveal where those limits sit, and why the next phase of the transition depends less on installing more panels and more on managing how and when solar energy is used.
Why commuter suburbs amplify the problem
Solar-heavy suburbs do not all behave the same way. What makes places like Baldivis and parts of Kwinana especially challenging for the grid is not just how much solar they have, but how residents use electricity during the day.
These are commuter suburbs by design. Most households leave early in the morning and return in the late afternoon or evening. During the sunniest hours, when rooftop systems are producing at their peak, local electricity demand is unusually low. Air conditioners are off, appliances are idle, EVs are unplugged, and there is little commercial or industrial load nearby to soak up the surplus. The energy is there, but the demand is not.
From the grid’s perspective, this creates a sharp mismatch. Instead of solar power being consumed close to where it is generated, it floods back onto local distribution lines all at once. Voltage rises locally, not because the system lacks demand overall, but because the demand is physically somewhere else. The network cannot easily move that excess energy to where it is needed without breaching technical limits.
This is why solar-rich commuter suburbs often experience tighter export controls than inner-city or mixed-use areas with similar levels of rooftop capacity. In places with daytime offices, shops, schools, and services, solar generation aligns more naturally with consumption. In commuter suburbs, human behaviour and urban planning work against that alignment.
Why rooftop batteries alone don’t fix this
At first glance, the solution seems obvious. If excess solar is the problem, store it. Home batteries allow households to capture midday generation and use it later, reducing exports and easing pressure on the grid. In practice, though, rooftop batteries only solve part of the problem, and not always in the way people expect.
Individual batteries operate at the household level, responding to one’s home generation and consumption patterns. They are not designed to manage what is happening across an entire street or suburb. When sizes or hundreds of batteries charge and discharge independently, their combined behaviour can still be poorly aligned with what the local network needs. In some cases, they simply shift peaks rather than flatten them, especially if they respond to the same price signals or default settings.
Cost and access also limit their impact. Many households in solar-heavy suburbs cannot afford a battery or are renting and have no control over installing one. Even in areas with high uptake, rooftop batteries rarely reach the penetration needed to stabilise local voltage or relieve transformer constraints on their own.
This is why network operators view home batteries as helpful but insufficient. They reduce exports from individual houses, but they do not provide coordinated control at the point where constraints actually occur. The grid challenge exposed in places like Baldivis is a shared one, rooted in local infrastructure, and it requires solutions that can act at that same local scale rather than relying solely on household-by-household decisions.
Why community batteries emerged as a network solution
Community batteries exist because the grid problem in solar-rich suburbs is not individual behaviour, but collective impact. When constraints occur at the level of a transformer or feeder, solutions need to sit there too. This is where community batteries fundamentally differ from household storage.
Installed on the distribution network, community batteries absorb excess rooftop solar before it causes voltage or congestion issues. Instead of hundreds of systems exporting simultaneously, surplus energy is captured locally and released later when demand rises. From a grid perspective, this smooths both peaks and troughs in a way individual batteries cannot reliably achieve on their own.
Their value is not limited to solar households. Since they operate at the network level, community batteries can support renters, apartments, and homes without solar by improving local supply during evening peaks. They also allow network operators to actively manage charging and discharging in response to real-time conditions, rather than relying on passive household settings.
In WA, where solar penetration is already among the highest in the world, community batteries are less a future concept and more a practical response to present-day constraints. They reflect a change in thinking: away from simply encouraging more rooftop generation, and toward treating storage as essential grid infrastructure.
What this means for solar households now
In solar-heavy suburbs, the rules around rooftop solar have already changed. Export limits are tighter, feed-in tariffs are lower, and new connections are increasingly designed to protect the local network rather than maximise exports. For households, this often feels like solar is delivering less value than it used to, even though systems are producing just as much energy.
The reason is timing. Midday solar has become abundant, while its ability to earn a return has diminished. Electricity is worth more in the evening, when people are home, and demand rises. This is why policy and investment are shifting toward storage, load shifting, and local energy solutions instead of simply adding more panels.
The suburbs that embraced rooftop solar early are now revealing how value is being redefined. Solar still matters, but in 2026, it is no longer just about how much energy you generate. It is about when and where that energy is used.
Energy Matters has been in the solar industry since 2005 and has helped over 40,000 Australian households in their journey to energy independence.
Complete our quick Solar Quote Quiz to receive up to 3 FREE solar quotes from trusted local installers – it’ll only take you a few minutes and is completely obligation-free.
