Comparing Leading Solar Financing Options in Australia

Australia’s solar market has entered a new phase of maturity. After years of rapid price drops, panel and inverter costs have stabilised, interest rates have steadied, and the national rooftop capacity has surpassed 20 GW. Yet, for many homeowners, the biggest question isn’t which panels to choose, but it’s how to pay for them. With another step-down in Small-scale Technology Certificates (STCs) scheduled for January 2026, the way you finance your system now could have a greater impact on long-term savings than the technology itself. 

At the tail end of 2025, the financing landscape is more crowded and competitive than ever. Traditional green loans from major banks are being joined by retailer-linked Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs), interest-free payment plans, and emerging “solar-as-a-service” subscriptions. Each promises lower upfront costs, but the fine print determines whether you actually win your energy future or simply rent it. 

For those considering solar before the new rebate thresholds take effect, the next few months represent a window of opportunity. Rebates remain generous, lenders are still offering favourable rates for clean energy upgrades, and installation backlogs haven’t yet surged ahead of the January 2026 rush. Choosing the right financing path now is more about locking in control, eligibility, and long-term return before the market resets again. 

The late-2025 solar finance landscape

The solar finance market has grown more sophisticated in 2025, reflecting the maturity of the industry and the evolving expectations of homeowners. System prices, which fell sharply through 2023 and 2024, have now plateaued. While panels and inverters remain affordable, the real story is how Australians are paying for them. What once was a barrier, financing is now an enabler with a mix of bank-backed green loans, government-supported lending schemes, and new retail partnerships for households of every size. 

Interest rates have steadied after years of volatility, creating a more predictable borrowing environment. Major banks have reintroduced fixed-rate sustainability products with long-term security, while digital lenders continue to expand their footprint through streamlined approval processes and competitive clean-energy loan products. At the same time, energy retailers are moving beyond supply to offer bundled solar financing, PPAs, and subscription models that combine panels, batteries, and monitoring under one payment plan. 

This competition is producing tangible benefits: 

• Lower effective costs of entry
• Greater flexibility
• More options to align repayments with expected energy savings

Yet, it has also introduced new complexity. The differences between ownership models, rebate eligibility, and contract terms are not always clear, and that confusion can cost thousands over the life of a system. 

As 2026 approaches, understanding the nuances between these financing paths is essential. The most advantageous choice depends on:

• Household budget
• How long you plan to stay in your home
• Your appetite for maintenance and control
• Your access to rebates before they step down again in the new year

Green loans: Still the good standard for ownership

Green loans are still the most balanced and financially sound path to ownership. They are purpose-built and designed specifically for energy-efficient upgrades, offering lower interest rates and longer repayment terms than standard personal loans. They have become the benchmark for solar affordability, allowing households to retain full ownership of their systems while spreading the cost over time. 

The fundamentals haven’t changed: the bank or lender pays the installer directly, and you repay the balance in fixed instalments, typically over five to ten years. What has changed is the range and accessibility of these products. 

Major lenders such as Commonwealth Bank, ANZ Plus, and NAB continue to offer dedicated green finance packages, while digital-first platforms like Brighte and Plenty are competing aggressively with quick approvals and interest rates averaging between 4% and 6%. Those with good credit and stable income will find that these loans offer some of the lowest-cost capital in the consumer market. 

The advantage of a green loan is straightforward: you own the solar system from day one, which means you retain all the benefits. You can claim federal Small-scale Technology Certificates (STCs) and any applicable state rebates, qualify for feed-in tariffs (FiTs), and enjoy the full energy savings without sharing them with a third party. Over time, those savings usually exceed the total interest paid on the loan. 

A typical example is a $9,000 system financed at 5% interest over 7 years. Even with repayments factored in, the average homeowner still breaks even in 6-7 years, faster if they consume most of their power during daylight hours. 

However, there are considerations. As with any loan, approval depends on creditworthiness, and missing repayments can affect your credit score. Upfront eligibility checks may include verification of the installer’s Clean Energy Council (CEC) accreditation, ensuring the system meets national standards. Yet for those planning to stay in their property for several years, the numbers are compelling. 

Green loans maximise control and rebate eligibility and deliver the strongest long-term return on investment in a stable and transparent structure. 

PPAs: Pay for power, not panels

PPAs have re-emerged in 2025 as a serious alternative for those who want the benefits of solar without the upfront commitment of ownership. Under a PPA, a third-party provider installs, owns, and maintains the solar system on your roof. You then buy the electricity it produces at a fixed rate, which is usually lower than your standard grid tariff. It’s not a new concept, but a wave of retailer-backed partnerships in states like New South Wales (NSW), Queensland (QLD), and South Australia (SA) has made PPAs more flexible, transparent, and accessible than they were five years ago. 

What makes it appealing is its simplicity. There’s no capital outlay, no maintenance responsibility, and immediate access to cheaper daytime power. For those with high daytime energy use, such as those working from home or running energy-intensive appliances, the savings can be immediate and meaningful. Typical contracts span 10 to 20 years, with per-kilowatt-hour rates set below grid prices to guarantee savings from day one. In some cases, PPAs also include performance guarantees or the option to buy out the system later at a depreciated value, adding a measure of control that older agreements lacked. 

However, the trade-offs are: 

• You don’t own the system
• You can’t claim federal or state rebates 
• You don’t benefit from FiTs for exported energy

That means your long-term savings plateau after the initial bill reductions. PPAs also bind you to fixed-term agreements, which can complicate property sales or refinancing. Existing early often requires a system buyout payout, and the longer the contract, the higher the total electricity cost over time compared with direct ownership. 

Despite these limitations, PPAs serve a clear role in today’s landscape, allowing homeowners who can’t or prefer not to take on debt to still participate in solar adoption. In an environment where grid electricity remains volatile and household budgets are tightening, that’s a meaningful option. 

Solar leases: Familiar convenience, fading appeal

Solar leases once played a defining role in Australia’s residential solar expansion, bridging the gap for homeowners who wanted renewable energy without upfront investment. In 2025, however, the leasing model has lost ground to more transparent and flexible alternatives like green loans and PPAs. Still, it remains a viable option for a narrow segment of households, particularly those with short-term occupancy plans or limited borrowing capacity. 

The concept is simple: instead of buying a solar system, you lease it for a fixed monthly fee. The installer or financing company retains ownership and handles maintenance throughout the contract term, which typically ranges from 7-15 years. You consume the electricity your system produces and, depending on the arrangement, may still receive credits for exported power. When the lease ends, you can often choose to extend it, remove the system, or buy it outright for a residual value. 

For some, this arrangement still makes sense. A solar lease offers predictability and convenience, with no large outlay, no servicing costs, and minimal financial risk if something breaks. It’s particularly useful for households that can’t qualify for a loan but still want to hedge against high grid prices. However, the advantages come at a price. You’re not eligible for federal STCs or state rebates, and you don’t benefit from system depreciation or asset ownership. Over the full term, cumulative lease payments often exceed the cost of purchasing a comparable system, sometimes by 20-30%.

The market itself reflects this preference change. As PPAs have matured and financing options widened, fewer providers are offering traditional leases. Those that remain, such as a handful of regional utilities and third-party financiers, now integrate buyout clauses to make the model more flexible. Even so, the long-term economics remain weaker than ownership-based alternatives. For those planning to stay put for more than 5 years, a lease generally underperforms compared with a green loan or cash purchase. 

By the end of 2025, solar leasing will have largely become a transitional option, suitable for those who need short-term stability but not ideal for those seeking maximum return. It may deliver immediate cost relief, but it limits access to the full financial and policy advantages that ownership provides, particularly as Australia’s rebate system tightens and energy markets continue to evolve. 

Buy Now, Pay Later and installer payment plans: Quick access with careful fine print

Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) platforms and in-house installer payment plans continue to make solar accessible to households that might otherwise delay installation. Services like Brighte, Humm, and Zip are well-established players in the clean energy space, promoting fast approvals and “interest-free” marketing offers that appeal to cost-conscious homeowners. These arrangements make solar feel as easy as financing a new phone or appliance: quick, convenient, and with minimal paperwork. 

However, the BNPL model for solar has matured, and with that maturity has come tighter oversight and changing economics. Since new national credit rules came into effect earlier this year, providers must now disclose effective interest rates and total repayment costs more transparently. While entry barriers are low, often no deposit and approval within 24 hours, the fine print can carry weight. Once promotional interest-free periods end, annual rates can rise sharply, sometimes reaching 14-20%. Missed payments or late fees also erode savings quickly. 

For smaller systems or add-ons (e.g. upgrading an inverter, adding a battery, or expanding an existing array), BNPL remains efficient. It lets households act immediately, specifically when rebate schemes or installer discounts have time limits. But for full system installations, a BNPL plan can become more expensive over time than a structured green loan. A $7,000 solar system, for instance, might appear interest-free over time than a structured green loan. A $7,000 solar system, for instance, might appear interest-free for 24 months, yet require repayments of nearly $300 per month. By contrast, the same system financed under a 7-year green loan could halve that monthly cost while still yielding ownership and rebate eligibility. 

Installer payment plans operate on similar terms but are often tied to the provider’s financing partner. They can streamline the pierces, but they rarely offer the best long-term rate. Homeowners should confirm who the underlying financier is, whether the contract is regulated under consumer credit law, and what happens after introductory terms expire. 

BNPL and installer plans serve a clean purpose—they remove the initial hurdle and speed up adoption. But as solar shifts to necessity, financial sustainability matters just as much as environmental benefit. Used wisely and for the right system size, these products make solar accessible. Used casually, they can quietly absorb the very savings solar was meant to create. 

Solar subscriptions: Flexibility without ownership

Subscription-based models are relatively new and have gained steady traction this year, especially in NSW and VIC. Often called “solar-as-a-service,” these arrangements let homeowners or renters access solar energy through a monthly subscription fee, avoiding the upfront cost of equipment and the need for a loan. Retailers like Origin Energy and ShineHub have led the way, bundling solar, battery storage, and sometimes smart monitoring into a single package. 

The concept is straightforward: the provider installs and maintains the solar system, and you pay a fixed monthly amount for its use. The rate is generally lower than your previous electricity bill, giving instant savings without a financing application or credit risk. Maintenance, performance monitoring, and system repairs are handled by the provider, making the experience largely hands-free. This flexibility is appealing, particularly when the property owner consents to installation. 

As with other non-ownership models, this has limitations. Subscribers don’t qualify for federal or state rebates, and they forfeit feed-in tariffs (FiTs) since exported energy is credited to the system owner. Over the long term, those missed benefits compound. You’re essentially paying for access, not building an asset. The subscription also continues indefinitely, and while it can usually be cancelled with notice, doing so removes access to the system entirely. 

That said, solar subscriptions fill an important gap in the market. They enable households that can’t take on debt (or don’t want to) to still participate in Australia’s clean energy transition. As energy retailers begin merging these plans with broader offerings that include home batteries and EV charging, the model could become an entry point for households seeking flexibility before committing to ownership. Still, for anyone planning to stay in their home for the long term, subscriptions remain the least cost-effective route to energy independence. They offer simplicity today but surrender tomorrow’s savings. 

Comparing value and ownership across financing options

By the end of 2025, the solar financing market will be defined by outcomes. Nearly every household can now install solar with little or no upfront cost, but what separates one financing path from another is how much control, eligibility, and long-term value it delivers. Ownership remains the key differentiator. 

Those who own their system outright retain full access to federal and state incentives and capture the highest return on investment over the life of the system. Non-ownership models, while convenient, often trade immediate affordability for diminished long-term savings. 

The table below outlines how today’s major options across the key decision factors: 

Rebates and policy updates shaping 2026 decisions

The end of 2025 marks an important cut-off for homeowners planning to install solar. Several national and state incentives are due for revision in the new year, meaning the timing of your installation could determine how much support you receive. 

Federal STC rebate: one step down in January 2026

• The STC scheme continues to phase down each year.
• On 1 January 2026, the deeming period shortens again, reducing the total rebate value by around $300-$600 for a typical 6.6 kW system.
• Systems installed and approved before the new year will lock in the higher 2025 rate, making December an ideal window to act. 

State rebates and loan programs

Victoria

• The Solar Homes Program still offers up to $1,400 in rebates plus an interest-free loan of equal value.
• Eligibility may tighten in 2026 as finding shifts toward home batteries and virtual power programs. 

New South Wales

• Low-interest Brighte Green Loans remain available under the Energy Saver partnership, offering repayment flexibility for approved solar and efficiency upgrades.

South Australia

• The state’s Home Battery Scheme extensions continue to support low-income households and small businesses.
• Some regional councils are also exploring solar leasing and battery-sharing initiatives. 

Queensland & Western Australia

• These states rely more on FiTs and community battery projects than direct rebates.
• Homeowners here still benefit from competitive tariffs and new grid-sharing trials that reward energy exports. 

Why timing matters

• Installing before January 2026 can mean hundreds in extra savings from higher STC values.
• Loan and rebate programs are still plentiful now but expected to narrow in focus next year.
• Installation lead times typically spike in December as households rush to secure pre-deeming rates. 

Making your decision: Ownership vs flexibility

Choosing how to finance your solar system is a decision about control, longevity, and confidence. The end of 2025 offers more options than ever, but each falls somewhere along a spectrum between ownership and flexibility, and your ideal position depends on your circumstances. 

If you’re planning to stay in your home for at least 7 years, ownership-based finance delivers the strongest long-term return. A green loan, even with modest interest, allows you to own the system outright, access full rebates, and enjoy years of free electricity once repayments end. Every dollar you repay adds to your property’s value and moves you closer to full energy independence. 

On the other hand, if you value low commitment or can’t secure traditional finance, non-ownership models, such as PPAs, leases, or subscriptions, offer an easier entry point. They provide predictable costs, maintenance coverage, and immediate bill relief. Yet their trade-off is structural: you’ll save in the short term, but you’ll never own the asset that produces those savings. 

A few key questions can help clarify your best fit: 

• How long do you plan to stay in your current home?
• Are you eligible for federal or state rebates, and do you want to claim them directly?
• Would you prefer full control and ownership, or a hands-off service model?
• Does your current energy usage justify the investment now, before 2026’s policy adjustments? 

The decision doesn’t hinge on what’s cheapest today, but on which path builds the most lasting benefit. With rebates still favourable, loan rates competitive, and system prices stable, the final months of 2025 represent a uniquely advantageous time to choose. Acting before the 2026 STC reduction ensures you’re not just buying solar—you’re locking in ownership of your energy future while the terms remain in your favour.

Energy Matters has been in the solar industry since 2005 and has helped over 40,000 Australian households in their journey to energy independence.

Complete our quick Solar Quote Quiz to receive up to 3 FREE solar quotes from trusted local installers – it’ll only take you a few minutes and is completely obligation-free.