Rooftop solar has changed household energy bills across Australia, but renters have largely watched from the sidelines. While owner-occupiers have been able to lock in long-term savings, most rental households still pay full retail electricity prices with little control over how their power is generated.
Queensland’s (QLD) newly launched solar rebate for renters is designed to change that. By offering financial incentives to landlords to install rooftop solar on rental properties, the scheme aims to unlock bill savings for tenants who have long been excluded from solar support programs. It is a targeted intervention in a system that has struggled to reconcile rising energy costs with the realities of renting, and it raises a bigger question: whether renters’ access to solar is finally being treated as an energy policy priority rather than an afterthought.
What QLD’s new renter solar rebate actually does
The scheme provides rebates of up to $3,500 per rental property to support the installation of rooftop solar systems. Funding is capped at $26.3 million, with the program expected to support around 6,500 rental homes across QLD.
The rebate is claimed by landlords. To be eligible, the property must be an existing rental with an active tenancy agreement in place. Landlords must obtain written consent from the tenant before installation, and body corporate approval where the property is part of a strata scheme. New builds and owner-occupied homes are excluded.
Systems must meet minimum technical standards, including compliance with current Australian standards for solar PV and connection requirements set by the local network provider. Once installed, the solar system remains the property of the landlord, while tenants benefit indirectly through reduced grid electricity usage during daylight hours.
Government estimates suggest participating renters could save around $700 per year on power bills, depending on system size, household usage patterns, and prevailing electricity prices. The rebate reduces the upfront cost for landlords but does not mandate rent freezes or rent reductions, meaning savings for tenants are limited to electricity bills rather than broader housing costs.
In effect, the program is designed to change the cost-benefit balance just enough to prompt landlord action, rather than fully closing the gap between renter and homeowner access to solar.
Why this rebate lands in a policy grey zone
What makes QLD’s renter solar rebate notable is not just who it targets, but when it arrives. The scheme has been launched at a time when the state’s broader renewable energy direction remains uncertain, with few clear signals about long-term targets or grid planning beyond short-term measures.
Rooftop solar, in this context, is being treated as a separate track from wider energy policy. While large-scale renewables and system planning face delays and debate, small-scale solar continues to be supported through targeted programs that sit somewhat outside the bigger strategy. That creates a fragmented picture for households trying to understand where energy policy is heading.
For renters, this matters because their access to solar is already conditional on decisions made by landlords, networks, and governments. A rebate introduced without a clear, long-term framework raises questions about whether renter access is being embedded into energy planning, or simply patched in where it is politically and economically convenient.
What landlords are being asked to change
At its core, the rebate is designed to nudge landlords toward an upgrade they have historically avoided. Rooftop solar has offered limited direct benefit to property owners who do not live in the home, particularly when installation costs, administration, and tenant coordination are factored in.
The rebate reduces the upfront cost, but it does not remove the practical hurdles. Landlords still need to organise installation, secure tenant consent, manage access to the property, and ensure the system meets connection requirements. Ongoing maintenance and any inverter or system faults also remain the owner’s responsibility.
As a result, uptake is likely to depend less on technology and more on landlord attitudes. Owners focused on long-term asset value or tenant retention may see solar as a worthwhile improvement. Others may still view it as an unnecessary complication, even with a rebate on offer.
What renters realistically gain from the scheme
For renters, the immediate benefit of rooftop solar is straightforward: lower electricity bills during daylight hours. When solar generation covers part of a household’s daytime usage, less power is drawn from the grid at full retail rates. Over the course of a year, those savings can add up, particularly for households that are home during the day or can shift some usage to daylight hours.
However, there are limits. Renters have no control over system size, orientation, or whether a battery is included. Savings depend heavily on how the system is configured and how the household uses electricity, and there is no guarantee the installation will be optimised for tenant benefit rather than minimum cost.
Even so, access matters. For many renters, some exposure to solar savings is better than none, especially in a market where electricity prices remain volatile and rental options are already constrained.
How this compares with earlier rental solar programs
QLD has tested versions of renter-focused solar support before, but on a much smaller and more limited scale. Earlier programs were typically confined to specific regions or pilot areas, with tight eligibility criteria and modest funding that capped overall impact. As a result, they demonstrated potential without materially shifting renter access across the state.
This version is broader and more visible. It applies statewide, offers a clearer rebate amount, and is framed as a mainstream support measure rather than a short-term trial. That alone increases the likelihood of uptake, particularly among landlords who may have previously dismissed solar as irrelevant to rental properties.
What remains unclear is whether the program is large enough to move beyond incremental change. Even at full take-up, it will reach only a fraction of QLD’s rental stock. The scheme improves access at the margins, but it does not yet signal a structural shift in how renters’ energy access is treated across the housing market.
The unresolved issues around exports, batteries, and fairness
Even with a rooftop solar installer, renters remain exposed to parts of the energy system they cannot influence. Export limits and feed-in tariffs (FiTs) are set by networks and retailers, not tenants, and these settings determine how much value a small rental system can actually deliver. If export conditions tighten in the future, renters may see reduced benefits without having had any say in the system design.
Batteries highlight the fairness gap even more clearly. While storage can protect solar value and increase bill savings, it is rarely included in rental installations due to cost and complexity. That leaves renters dependent on daytime self-consumption alone, while owner-occupiers increasingly use batteries to manage exports and rising evening prices.
The result is a two-tier outcome. Renters may finally gain access to solar, but they remain less equipped to respond to policy changes, grid constraints, or pricing shifts. Without parallel support for storage or stronger renter protections, the gap between solar access and solar control is likely to persist.
What renters and landlords should watch next
The success of the rebate will hinge on how many landlords choose to participate and how quickly funding is taken up. Early demand will signal whether the incentive is strong enough to overcome hesitation or whether administrative friction continues to limit uptake.
Policy adjustments are also worth watching. Changes to eligibility rules, rebate levels, or system requirements would indicate whether the scheme is being treated as a long-term fixture or a short-term intervention. Any expansion to include batteries or higher-capacity systems would materially change its impact on renters.
Before QLD, attention will turn to whether other states follow with similar renter-focused incentives. If they do, this rebate may mark the start of a broader shift. If not, it risks remaining an isolated measure in an uneven national approach to renter energy access.
Progress, but not parity
Queensland’s new renter solar rebate marks a clear step forward in addressing one of the most persistent gaps in Australia’s energy transition. It acknowledges that renters should not be permanently excluded from the benefits of rooftop solar simply because they do not own the roof above them.
At the same time, the scheme stops short of delivering equal footing. Renters gain access to lower bills, but not ownership, control, or long-term certainty. Decisions about system design, upgrades, and future changes remain firmly in the hands of landlords and policymakers.
For now, the rebate improves access rather than delivers parity. It reduces the distance between renters and solar savings, but it does not close it. Whether this becomes a foundation for broader reform or remains a one-off fix will depend on what comes next.
Energy Matters has been in the solar industry since 2005 and has helped over 40,000 Australian households in their journey to energy independence.
Complete our quick Solar Quote Quiz to receive up to 3 FREE solar quotes from trusted local installers – it’ll only take you a few minutes and is completely obligation-free.
